Undisclosed compensation
Banking or advisory relationships in which third-party compensation, fee sharing, or inducements were retained without transparent disclosure.
Asset Recovery & Wealth Protection
We identify, quantify, and recover value erosion caused by opacity, fee structures, intermediary behaviour, or misaligned stewardship of private wealth. Broader than retrocessions, narrower than generic disputes.
Scope
Broader than retrocessions. Focused on where private wealth was diluted by opacity.
Mandate Character
We begin with records, fee logic, fiduciary expectations, and recoverability. Some situations resolve through documentation and negotiation. Others justify a more formal recovery path.
Counterparties
Private clients, family offices, estates, and advisory relationships affected by opacity or a breach of fiduciary duty.
Posture
Forensic reading first. Escalation only where leverage, documentation, and economics justify it.
Outcome
Clarity on what is recoverable, what is defensible, and which path preserves the strongest overall position.
Typical Situations
Matters are assessed individually on documentation quality, recoverability, and the specifics of each mandate relationship.
Banking or advisory relationships in which third-party compensation, fee sharing, or inducements were retained without transparent disclosure.
Wealth structures in which delegated product selection, fee layering, or mandate design diluted value over time.
Situations requiring coordination across jurisdictions with Swiss-anchored documentation, controlled escalation, and disciplined recovery logic.
Credentials
Estimate
A first indication based on relationship duration, asset range, and mandate profile.
Basiert auf Art. 400 OR. Schätzungen sind indikativ.
Definieren Sie den Umfang des Audits.
Contact
Every mandate begins with a confidential initial discussion. Structured, discreet, and without unnecessary publicity.
Zurich